فصلنامه روندها و دستاوردها در فناوری یادگیری

فصلنامه روندها و دستاوردها در فناوری یادگیری

بهبود ادغام فناوری به کمک استراتژی‌های آموزشی (مطالعه موردی: برنامه «شاد»)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار گروه علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
فناوری تنها گزینه اجباری برای کسب مهارت‌های قرن 21 به شمار می‌آید. با این حال، فناوری یک ابزار جادویی برای یادگیری نیست و صرفا نقشی خنثی در یادگیری داشته و به خودی‌خود هیچ نوع مزیت خاصی ایحاد نمی‌کند. اخیرا مدل‌هایی از جمله Triple E ظهور کرده‌اند که بر اهداف یادگیری متمرکز بوده و با کمک استراتژی‌های آموزشی و انتخاب هدفمند ابزار، پتانسیل بالایی برای تجلی ماهیت تحولی فناوری نشان داده اند. تحقیق حاضر با هدف بررسی بهبود ادغام فناوری در برنامه «شاد» با استفاده از مدل Triple E و به کمک استراتژی‌های آموزشی انجام شد. روش این تحقیق، شبه‌آزمایشی (یک‌گروه با پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون) و جامعه آماری آن، معلمان علوم‌تجربی متوسطه‌اول بود. در مرحله مداخله و ارزیابی، از روبریکTriple E (Kolb, 2017) و استراتژی‌های آموزشی مرتبط استفاده شده و داده ها از طریق آزمون t زوجی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین نمرات پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون در کل روبریک و همچنین در مولفه‌های آن وجود دارد. با این حال، امتیاز ادغام فناوری در پس‌آزمون (23/10) هنوز هم چندان مطلوب نیست (پایین تر از 13). با توجه به نتایج؛ معلمان کم‌تجربه در ادغام فناوری، توانستند با کمک استراتژی‌های آموزشی به سطح نسبتا خوبی در ادغام فناوری ارتقا پیدا کنند. از طرف دیگر، یکی از کاربردهای مدل Triple E، تشخیص مناسب بودن ابزارهای فناوری برای اهداف یادگیری است. بنابراین، می توان نتیجه گرفت که برنامه «شاد» از پتانسیل خوبی جهت ادغام فناوری برخوردار است. علاوه بر این، نتایج نشان داد که مدل Triple E با تسهیل انتخاب استراتژی‌های آموزشی متناسب با اهداف یادگیری و همچنین امکان ارزیابی این اهداف، به بهبود ادغام فناوری کمک می کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Improving technology integration with the help of instructional strategies (case study: "Shad" app)

نویسندگان English

ebrahim azarshab 1
Mohammad Ghahramani 2
Mahmoud Abolghasemi 2
Esmaeil Azimi 3
1 Shahid Beheshti UniversPh.D. Candidate in Educational Administration, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran ity
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tarbiat modarres University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Technology is the only mandatory option for acquiring 21st-century skills. However, technology is not a magical tool for learning, it merely plays a neutral role in learning and does not provide any special advantages by itself. Recently, models such as Triple E have emerged focused on learning goals, and with the help of instructional strategies and purposeful selection of tools, they have shown a high potential to manifest the transformational nature of technology. In this regard, with the help of this model, the current research will examine the integration of the "Shad" technological app in education as best as possible. The method of this research was quasi-experimental (one group with pre-test and post-test) and its statistical population was first secondary science teachers. In the intervention and evaluation stage, the Triple E rubric (Kolb, 2017) and related instructional strategies were used, and the data were analyzed through paired t-tests. The findings showed that there is a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores in the entire rubric as well as in its components. However, the technology integration score in the post-test (10.23) is still not very favorable (below 13). According to the results; Teachers with little experience in technology integration were able to improve to a relatively high level in technology integration with the help of instructional strategies. On the other hand, one of the applications of the Triple E model is to determine the appropriateness of technology tools for learning goals. Therefore, it can be concluded that the "Shad" app has a good potential for technology integration. In addition, the results showed that the Triple E model helps improve technology integration by facilitating the selection of instructional strategies appropriate to the learning goals and the possibility of evaluating these goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Technology integration
Triple E model
Instructional strategies
"
Shad"
app
خجسته، سعیده. (1401). اثربخشی آموزش مجازی با استفاده از سامانه شاد بر انگیزه پیشرفت و مدیریت زمان دانش آموزان در زمان همه‌گیری بیماری کرونافناوری و دانش‌پژوهی در تعلیم و تربیت، 1(2)، 45-54. doi: 10.30473/t-edu.2021.8724
دوجی، بی‌بی حلیفه، مقیمی، زهرا، و حاجیلو، وحید. (1400). تأثیر برنامه آموزش مجازی شبکه شاد بر کارآمدی معلمان و ارتقای سطح یادگیری دانش آموزان. نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان‌ها، ۱۰(۳)، ۵۱-۷۸.
Arguello, M. (2018). Student Engagement: What is the Best Way to Motivate Students in the Secondary Classroom?. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/honorsprojects/713
Bakic, M., Pakala, K., Bairaktarova, D., & Bose, D. (2022). Work-in-Progress: Mobile Assisted Gains through Innovative Curriculum for Students in the Thermal-Fluids Science Course. DOI:10.18260/1-2--41031
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Powerful learning: Studies show deep understanding derives from collaborative methods. Edutopia. (October 2008). https://www.edutopia.org/inquiry-project-learning-research
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), n2. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ873676.pdf
Center for teaching and learning, c. f. (2017). Building Rubrics https://ctl.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/build-rubric.pdf
Chien, P. L. K., & Lajium, D. A. D. (2016). The effectiveness of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learning approach among secondary school students. In International Conference on Education and Psychology (Vol. 2013, pp. 95-104). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310651088_The_effectiveness_of_science_technology_engineering_and_mathematics_STEM_learning_approach_among_secondary_school_students
Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0527-3
Dexter, S., & Barton, E. A. (2021). The development and impact of team-based school technology leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2020-0260
Doji, Bibi Halifeh, Moghimi, & Hajilo. (2021). The effect of Shad network virtual training program on the effectiveness of teachers and improving the level of students' learning. Managing Education in Organizations Journal, 10(3), 51-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/meo.10.3.51 [In Persian]
Fatehi Rad, N., & Khadem Hosseini, N. (2022). SHAD Social Network and EFL Learners' Writing Complexity & Accuracy. Biannual Journal of Education Experiences, 5(1), 79-100. https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/jee/Article/694451?jid=694451
Francom, G. M. (2020). Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. https://staging.oer4pacific.org/id/eprint/5
Grévisse, C., Rothkugel, S., & Reuter, R. A. (2019). Scaffolding support through integration of learning material. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0107-0
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
Haryani, F., & Ayuningtyas, N. (2021, July). The impact of interactive online learning by Pear Deck during COVID-19 pandemic era. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1957, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1957/1/012006
Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education, 101, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
Khojasteh, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of E-Learning Through theShad Program on Students' Motivation for Progress and Time Management During Coronavirus Disease. Technology and scholarship in education, 1(2), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.30473/t-edu.2021.8724 [In Persian]
Keren-Kolb, L. (2013). Engage, Enhance, and Extend Learning!. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(7), 20-27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1015177
Kolb, L. (2017). Learning first, technology second: The educator’s guide to designing authentic lessons. International Society for Technology in Education. https://iste.org/news/learning-first-technology-second-new-from-iste-books-shows-teachers-how-to-design-authentic-measurable-lessons
Macgilchrist, F. (2019). Cruel optimism in edtech: When the digital data practices of educational technology providers inadvertently hinder educational equity. Learning, Media and Technology, 4(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PloS one, 10(12), e0144008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008
O'Neal, L. J., Gibson, P., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing Progress: Insights on Personalized Learning Implementation and Effects. Research Report. RR-2042-BMGF. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2042
Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of research on computing in education, 33(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
Schatzke, S. E. (2019). A validation study of the triple e rubric for lesson design: A measurement tool for technology use in the classroom University of North Texas]. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1505198/m2/1/high_res_d/SCHATZKE-DISSERTATION-2019.pdf
Sutter, T., & Dirkin, K. (2021, March). The Convergence of Triple E Framework Components and Michigan Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Affordances. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1336-1345). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219290/
The University of Texas at Austin (2017). Building Rubrics https://ctl.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/build-rubric.pdf
T Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
Wartella, E. (2015). Educational apps: What we do and do not know. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615578662
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
Wenglinsky, H. (2006). Technology and achievement: The bottom line. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 29–32. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/98779/
Widhiasih, L. K. S. (2023). YouTube Videos in Literacy Course: Students’ Response and Practice. International Journal of Applied Science and Sustainable Development (IJASSD), 5(2), 45-52. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/IJASSD/article/view/8226/6319
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1403